Search Results for "rubber cess"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "rubber cess"

37 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Excise Duty on Rubber Users Under the Rubber Act, 1947. Levy Valid as Excise Duty on Production Can Be Collected from Users and Act Contains Sufficient Policy Guidance Against Excessive Delegation.

25 Aug 1969

The case involved a challenge by Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers’ Association, an association of rubber chappal manufacturers in Jullundur, Pun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case - Cess Under Textile Committees Act Not Part of CVD. Cess under Section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is not includable in Countervailing Duty under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for exemption purposes.

2 Mar 2010

The appellant, M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Limited, a manufacturer of yarn, imported capital goods (textile machinery) under bills of entry dated 28t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Manufacturers in Sikkim Seeking Exemption from Education Cess and NCCD. Exemption Notification Strictly Construed; Cesses Not Covered as They Were Imposed by Separate Finance Acts After the Notification.

19 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by M/s. Unicorn Industries and Akshay Ispat and Ferro Alloys Private Limited against the judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeals on Cenvat Credit for Inputs Used in Exempted Goods, Partially Allows Revenue's Appeals on Education Cess. Tractors are exempted goods despite education cess, but separate accounts are required under Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

4 Dec 2019

The judgment concerns multiple appeals filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Assessee) and the Commissioner of Central Excise (Revenue) against a co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of SVLDRS Application for Service Tax Dispute. The court held that a VCES declaration that was not filed within the prescribed time and not processed does not constitute a 'voluntary disclosure' under Section 125(1)(e) of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, thus the petitioner is eligible for the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.

21 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Deelight Fortune Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, had given its commercial premises on leave and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Notification Levying Central Excise on Tobacco Products — Notification No.3/2019-Central Excise dated 06.07.2019 held valid and within powers under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the government has the power to modify or withdraw exemptions in public interest and that promissory estoppel does not apply to legislative functions.

21 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by manufacturers and dealers of tobacco and tobacco products, challenging Notification No.3/2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Technical Bid in Railway Tender — Petitioner's Bid Wrongly Rejected for Non-Submission of Documents Despite Compliance with Joint Venture Conditions. The court held that the rejection was arbitrary as the petitioner, a joint venture, had complied with the tender conditions applicable to joint ventures, and the respondents had erroneously applied conditions for individual bidders.

24 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s K.K. Vidyut, a joint venture, challenged the rejection of its technical bid by the respondent Railways in a tender for supplying m...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)