Search Results for "representative not accused"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "representative not accused"

588 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 588 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Revision in Income Tax Prosecution and Quashes Sessions Court Order Adding Partners as Accused Without Sanction Under Section 279 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 319 CrPC Application Fails as Prior Order Treating Partners as Representatives Was Final and Partnership Facts Were Already Known to Income Tax Department.

18 Jul 2025

The matter arose from three criminal revision applications before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Sessions Court dated 18 November 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 305(6) CrPC for Appointment as Company Representative. The court held that the trial court's order doubting the genuineness of resignation was unsustainable and directed fresh consideration.

16 Sep 2021

The petitioner, Krishnaswamy Sridhar, was accused No.4 in Special C.C. No.245/2002 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge an...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Companies Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside for Non-Prosecution of Director. Section 452 of Companies Act, 2013 requires that a director must be prosecuted for the company's default; acquittal of director without trial on merits is illegal.

14 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. P.M. Granites Exports Pvt. Ltd., filed a complaint under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013 against the respondent, T. Manohar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

6 Oct 2020

The appellant, Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 26-11-2015 in Special (A.C.B.) Case No.13 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to be Represented by Lawyer in Domestic Enquiry When Presenting Officer is Legally Trained and Facts are Complex. The court held that under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, a workman is entitled to legal representation if the presenting officer is legally trained and the facts are not simple.

25 Feb 2010

The Petitioner, an employee of Respondent No.1 since 1979, was served a charge-sheet on 8th July 2009 for alleged misbehavior and threats to an office...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in PC Act Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

24 Nov 2025

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Chandrapur, filed an appeal against the judgment and or...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

1 Mar 2018

The appellant, Uttam Ramaji Shere, was a public servant working with the Mahatma Fule Backward Development Corporation, Akola. He was convicted by the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor Under Section 24(8) of CrPC — Petitioner Alleges Likelihood of Bias as Appointee Had Previously Represented Complainant in Bail Proceedings

30 Sep 2021

The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case, Holds Authorization to File Complaint Can Be Inferred from Conduct and Documents. The court set aside acquittal and convicted accused under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheque, holding that authorization of complainant's representative was sufficiently proved.

8 Feb 2024

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Private Limited, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

11 Aug 2016

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)