Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of ACP Benefit from Retired Disabled Peon in Violation of Supreme Court Precedents and Section 47(2) of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Recovery After Superannuation Held Impermissible and Denial of ACP Scale Due to Disability Found Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a 55% disabled peon employed with the Zilla Parishad, Amravati, was promoted to Junior Assistant on 05.04.2006. He declined the promot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teacher Against Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Mistakenly During Service. Recovery of Mistaken Payment After Retirement Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent in State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Lata Gajanan Wankhede, a retired Assistant Teacher employed with Zilla Parishad, Akola, filed a writ petition challenging the recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Retired Employees Against Recovery Orders in Service Law Case Due to Lack of Hearing and Erroneous Employer Interpretation. Recovery of Excess Payments After Retirement Held Illegal as No Misrepresentation by Employees and Based on Equity Principles to Prevent Hardship.

The dispute involved retired stenographers who had been granted financial benefits in 2017 based on the Shetty Commission recommendations, which were ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Recovery of Excess Payment Under Time Bound Promotion Scheme. Recovery of Rs.2,58,711/- Set Aside as No Misrepresentation by Employee and Recovery Ordered Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Ajabrao Rambhau Patil, was appointed as Technical Assistant on 16.02.1982 in the office of respondent no.3. The post was later abolish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee; Directs Pension Refixation and Payment of Benefits with Interest. Recovery impermissible as excess payment made for over five years and employee belongs to Class III, applying principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Gendlal Dharkar, was initially appointed as a Tracer in Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran on 27/09/1991. Over the years, he received a ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Teacher for Not Passing MSCIT Exam in Time. Recovery from retirement benefits set aside as petitioner had given undertaking but recovery was held impermissible under principles of natural justice and proportionality.

The petitioner, Smt. Shaheen Fatima Mohsin Ahmed, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 1st January 1986 and superannuated on 31st January 2024. Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Pensionary Benefits from Retired Class III Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Rs.77,446/- directed after 17 years of pay fixation without misrepresentation by employee held unsustainable.

The petitioner, Devidas Marotirao Kandhare, a retired junior clerk (Class III) under the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, chall...