Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery from Retired Employee for Non-Passing of MS-CIT Exam — Recovery Held Impermissible After Retirement Under Article 226 of Constitution of India. Recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- from a retired Senior Clerk for not passing MS-CIT exam from 2008 to 2017 quashed as arbitrary and without prior notice.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 116
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Siraj Farooqui, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in 1997 and promoted to Senior Clerk on 29.07.2022. He superannuated on 31.07.2025. After retirement, while processing his service book, the respondents issued an order dated 11.12.2025 directing recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- on account of non-passing of MS-CIT exam from 01.01.2008 to 05.07.2017, and also recovery of Rs.10/- for excess pay fixation from 01.07.2006 to 01.07.2019. The petitioner challenged these recovery orders by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court considered the legality of recovery from a retired employee for non-passing of a computer course. The court held that such recovery after retirement, without any prior notice or opportunity to the petitioner, is arbitrary and cannot be sustained. The court quashed and set aside the impugned orders dated 11.12.2025 and 13.02.2026, and directed the respondents to release the recovered amount of Rs.4,45,731/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of recovery till payment, and also to release all retirement benefits including commutation of pension, leave encashment, and DCRG with interest at the same rate from the date they were due till actual payment.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Recovery from Retired Employee - Non-Passing of MS-CIT Exam - Recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- from petitioner after retirement for not passing MS-CIT exam from 2008 to 2017 - Court held that recovery after retirement without any prior notice or opportunity is arbitrary and unsustainable - Held that the impugned orders are quashed and set aside (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether recovery of amount from a retired employee on account of non-passing of MS-CIT exam is permissible under law

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed and set aside the impugned orders dated 11.12.2025 and 13.02.2026. Directed respondents to release the recovered amount of Rs.4,45,731/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of recovery till payment, and to release all retirement benefits including commutation of pension, leave encashment, and DCRG with interest at 6% per annum from the date they were due till actual payment.

Law Points

  • Recovery from retired employee for non-passing of MS-CIT exam is impermissible
  • Recovery after retirement without prior notice or opportunity is arbitrary
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India can be invoked against arbitrary recovery orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (04) 224

920 WRIT PETITION NO. 3234 OF 2026

2026-04-29

Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, Ajit B. Kadethankar

2026:BHC-AUG:20358-DB

Ms. A. N. Ansari for Petitioner, Mr. S. B. Narwade for Respondent State

Siraj Farooqui S/o Ahmed Mohiuddin

The State of Maharashtra, The Assistant Commissioner Establishment Municipal Corporation Chh. Sambhajinagar, The Chief Accountant Finance Officer Chh. Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging recovery orders passed after retirement

Remedy Sought

Quashing of recovery orders dated 11.12.2025 and 13.02.2026, direction to release recovered amount of Rs.4,45,731/- with interest, and direction to release all retirement benefits with interest

Filing Reason

Recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- from petitioner after retirement for non-passing of MS-CIT exam

Issues

Whether recovery of amount from a retired employee on account of non-passing of MS-CIT exam is permissible under law

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that he was appointed in 1997, promoted to Senior Clerk in 2022, and superannuated on 31.07.2025. After retirement, recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- was directed for non-passing of MS-CIT exam from 2008 to 2017. He contended that recovery after retirement without prior notice is arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi

Recovery from a retired employee for non-passing of a computer course, without any prior notice or opportunity, is arbitrary and cannot be sustained under law.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has put-forth prayer clauses B, C, D and E... After rendering long service, the Petitioner superannuated on 31.07.2025. Recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- was directed against him on account of non-passing of MS-CIT exam... The court held that such recovery after retirement, without any prior notice or opportunity to the petitioner, is arbitrary and cannot be sustained.

Procedural History

Petitioner superannuated on 31.07.2025. On 21.11.2025, recovery of Rs.4,45,731/- was directed. Petitioner submitted letter dated 02.12.2025. Respondent issued letter dated 11.12.2025 and 13.02.2026. Petitioner filed writ petition on 29.04.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over property sale consideration held to be purely contractual, not criminal, under Section 420 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Quashes APMC Notices Requiring License for Poultry Feed Purchase — Food Grains for Personal Consumption Not 'Agricultural Produce' Under KAPMR Act, 1966. Purchase of food grains solely for feeding poultry is personal consumptio...