Search Results for "recasting"

68 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Recasting of Issues in Tenancy Suit — No Error in Trial Court's Discretion. The Court held that the trial court's refusal to recast issues under Order XIV Rule 5 CPC was not perverse or arbitrary, as the proposed issues were already covered by existing issues.

The petitioner, Mr. Jitendra B. Mehta, filed a suit (R.A.D. Suit No.804 of 2010) before the Small Causes Court at Bombay seeking a declaration of tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Examination Order in Civil Suit — Right to Begin Evidence Not Absolute. Order 18 Rule 1 CPC permits court to direct which party shall begin, but such order can be reconsidered if circumstances change or if earlier order was passed without hearing the other side.

The petitioners, original defendant nos.1, 2, and 3 in Regular Civil Suit No.273/2013, challenged the order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Media Company in Cable TV Act Offences Following Decriminalization. Cognizance Taken Under Section 5/16 of Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 Set Aside as Amendment Removed Criminal Penalty, Making Offence Civil.

The petitioners, a television news company and its correspondents, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Satyawati Sharma to Larger Bench in Delhi Rent Control Eviction Case — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Non-Residential Premises Under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

The Supreme Court was hearing a batch of appeals arising from eviction petitions filed by landlords under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment and Recasting of Issues in Property Suit — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Amend Plaint and Add Relief of Possession Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC. Trial Court's Rejection of Amendment and Recasting of Issue Set Aside as Premature and Contrary to Law.

The petitioner, Archana Ashok Amburle, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.6 of 2012 before the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Dapoli, seeking a mandatory in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Recast Issues in Partition Suit — No Error in Trial Court's Refusal to Frame Additional Issues After Evidence Commenced. The court held that the application for recasting issues was belated and lacked justification under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC.

The case arises from a partition suit filed by Lalasaheb Dattoba Pawar (Respondent No. 1) against several defendants, including Balasaheb Dattoba Pawa...