Search Results for "provisional award"

289 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 289 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Controller's Refusal of Patent Registration Due to Non-Consideration of Arbitral Award and Deed of Assignment. Failure to Appreciate Evidence and Raise Objections in Examination Report Renders Order Unsustainable Under Section 15 of Patents Act, 1970.

The petitioner, Euro-apex B.V., entered into a licence agreement with Shinhan Apex Corporation in 1993, authorizing the latter to manufacture and sell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in NHAI Contract Dispute — BOQ Rate Applies to Increased Quantity Without Design Change. Variation Clause 52.2 Not Attracted Where Quantity Increase Due to Employer's Erroneous Estimate, Not Engineer's Instruction or Design Change.

The dispute arose out of a contract awarded by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to Somdatt Builders-NCC-NEC(JV) for four-laning of a hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute. Court upholds award based on settlement agreement and finds no grounds for interference under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Suratsingh Chaudhary, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitration award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...