Search Results for "oral license agreement"

508 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 508 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Leave and License Agreements Establish Licensee Status. Oral Lease Claim Rejected as Written Agreements Show Clear Intention to Grant Only License, Not Lease.

The plaintiff-respondent, owner of Shop No. 8, filed a suit for possession against the defendant-appellant, who was inducted as a licensee in 2007 und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Impounding Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — License Agreement for Telecom Infrastructure Not a 'Lease' Under Bombay Stamp Act. Agreement for installation of cellular mobile towers on rooftops held to be a license, not a lease, thus not liable to stamp duty as a lease.

The petitioners, Bharti Telventures Limited and Sunil Bharti Mittal, were licensees under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, to set up and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Held Valid, License Revocable Under Section 62 of Easements Act, 1882. Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Reversing Declaration of Ownership Without Cross-Appeal.

The appellant, Tulshidas Lokhande, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and possession of Plot No. 273 against the respondent, Madhukar Lokhande,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision in License Eviction Case — License Agreement Not Proved. Landlord failed to establish that respondent was inducted as licensee under Section 13A2 of Bombay Rent Act; competent authority's dismissal upheld.

The petitioner, Vijay Dinkarrao Karanjavane, claimed to be the owner of House No. 328, Nana Peth, Pune, and alleged that he had given a room on the gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery of Licence Fees and Mesne Profits in Hoarding Advertisement Dispute. Plaintiff partnership firm entitled to arrears and future compensation for defendant's continued use of hoarding sites after termination of licence.

The plaintiff, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, carried on business of acquiring sites, erecting hoardings, and permitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Market Committee and Licensee in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Licensee Estopped from Denying Licensor's Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act, 1872; Market Committee Not Necessary Party in Co-owner Dispute.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a shop in a market yard. The plaintiffs, Mohammad Hanif Abdul Wahid Shaikh and Mohammad Asif Mohammad H...