Search Results for "omissions not proved"

1442 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1442 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Voluntary Extra-Judicial Confession. Extra-Judicial Confession Made to Relatives and Landlord Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Circumstances, Affirming Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Ad-hoc Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thane, sentencing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Nos. 2-5 in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 r/w Section 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was full of contradictions, omissions, and improvements, and no independent witness supported the prosecution case.

The case pertains to the murder of Bal Kishan, son of informant Mullo Bai, which occurred on 01.12.2005 at around 4-5 a.m. in Village Hinotiya Gird. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Common Intention. Conviction Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, and Omissions in FIR and Innocent Early Statements Discredited the Case.

The case arose from the murder of Uday, a 24‑year‑old son of PW1 Ram Choudhary, a prominent BJP politician and former Mayor of Mudkhed Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Pandurang Waghere, was a Talathi working in the revenue department. The complainant, Suhas Jagtap, held a Power of Attorney for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prasada Sudhakar Kulkarni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of the victim. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals by Convicts in Group Assault and Murder Case; Key Eyewitness Accounts Found Suffering from Material Omissions. Evidence of Recovery of Weapons and Common Object Under IPC Sections 147, 148, 149 Re-evaluated.

These four criminal appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 14 June 2006 passed by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in ...