Search Results for "nazul land"

46 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Construction in Pachmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary Due to Pending Stay on Exclusion. Applicant's land not finally excluded from sanctuary; High Court's interim stay on Collector's order prevents any commercial activity without Court permission.

The applicant, M/s Shewalkar Developers Limited, filed interlocutory applications seeking permission to construct a health/eco-resort on two plots (Pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Land from ULC Proceedings Due to Abatement Under Repeal Act — Land Held to Be Bhoomiswami, Not Nazul Lease, Entitling Petitioners to Restoration of Possession and Mutation.

The petitioners, Smt. Parvatibai wd/o Dashrath Behar and Narayan s/o Late Shri Dashrath Behar, filed a writ petition seeking release of land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent, Prabhakar Uddarwar, who was a Nazul Surveyor in the office of Taluka Inspec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Trust Property Encroachment Case — Defendant Acquitted of Adverse Possession Claim. Suit for Possession by Trust Held Not Barred by Limitation as Encroachment is Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Namdeo Khedkar (appellant/defendant) against the judgment of the Joint District Judge, Chandrapur, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Possession of Suit Plot Not Acquired by Government. Land Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Include the Suit Plot, Hence Government Cannot Claim Title or Possession Without Proper Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.9.1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, dismissing Special Civil Suit No.86/1994 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Allotment of Nazul Plot to Ex-Serviceman Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Earlier Rejection. Collector's Order Set Aside as Petitioner's Easementary Rights Were Ignored and No Opportunity of Hearing Was Given.

The petitioner, Ismailkhan, owned land adjacent to a Nazul plot in Chandrapur. In 1972, one Abdul Majid applied for allotment of the plot for hotel pu...