Search Results for "mandatory examination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "mandatory examination"

2930 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2930 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Re-examination of Petitioner in NEET-SS 2023 Due to Technical Glitch During Biometric Verification. Petitioner's inability to provide left thumb impression due to a bandage on his left hand was a genuine technical issue, not an attempt at impersonation, warranting a fresh attempt.

31 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Dr. Shyamsundar s/o Kashiram Patil, a medical practitioner with an M.D. (Medicine) degree, applied for the D.M. (Doctor of Medicine) e...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitioner in TNPSC Group-IV Examination Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Signature Instructions. Non-Affixation of Signature or Thumb Impression on OMR Sheet Renders Answer Sheet Invalid Under TNPSC Instructions, and Court Cannot Relax Such Mandatory Rules Under Article 226.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a locomotor disabled person with 62% disability, appeared for the Combined Civil Services Examination-IV (Group-IV) conducted by the T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Rejecting Application to Examine Son as Witness Before Defendants; Restores Application for Fresh Decision. Court Holds Order 18 Rule 3A CPC is Directory and Permits Deviation Upon Sufficient Reasons.

23 Jan 2013

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenged an order dated 2 January 2012 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes University Notification Requiring Minimum 50% Marks in Each Theory Paper for MD Dermatology Examination — Directs Fresh Valuation of Answer Scripts. University Cannot Impose Additional Eligibility Criteria Beyond MCI Regulations; Notification Dated 1.7.2015 Held Arbitrary and Illegal.

27 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Dr. Haritha Ravipati and Mr. Mamidi Varun, were postgraduate medical students who appeared for the MD Dermatology examination conduct...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order in Civil Judge Recruitment Case - Violation of Examination Instructions Cannot Be Condoned on Sympathetic Grounds. The Court Held That Mandatory Instructions Prohibiting Use of Pencil in Answer Sheets Must Be Strictly Complied With, and High Court Cannot Relax Them Under Article 226.

28 Aug 2019

The case arose from a notification issued by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on 09.04.2018 inviting applications for 320 vacancies of Civil J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Deputy Collectors in Seniority Dispute Over Late Passing of Departmental Examination. The court held that seniority of direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in the selection list, not by the date of confirmation or passing of departmental examination, under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority among Deputy Collectors in Madhya Pradesh. The appellant, Warad Murti Mishra, was selected by the Madhya Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 202 CrPC Mandatory for Accused Residing Outside Jurisdiction — Larger Bench Resolves Conflict in Favor of Mandatory Inquiry Before Issuance of Process. The provision requiring inquiry before process when accused resides outside jurisdiction is mandatory, as held by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881.

16 Jan 2024

The case involves a reference to a larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a cleavage of opinion on whether the amendment to Section 202(1) o...

Supreme Court

611

20 Sep 1957

The respondent was an employee under the State of Uttar Pradesh. A departmental inquiry was initiated against him on charges that he had allowed his p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Against University for Denying Exam Forms Due to Attendance Shortfall — University Directed to Accept Forms and Permit Students to Appear for Exams. The court held that denial of examination forms without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and the right to education under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

10 Jul 2015

The petitioners, students of SVKM's Narsee Monjee College of Commerce and Economics affiliated to the University of Mumbai, were denied examination fo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)