Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Against University for Denying Exam Forms Due to Attendance Shortfall — University Directed to Accept Forms and Permit Students to Appear for Exams. The court held that denial of examination forms without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice and the right to education under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 68
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, students of SVKM's Narsee Monjee College of Commerce and Economics affiliated to the University of Mumbai, were denied examination forms for their respective courses on the ground that they had shortage of attendance as per the University's attendance requirements. The petitioners challenged this denial on the grounds that they were not given any prior notice or opportunity of hearing before the decision was taken, and that the attendance records were not properly maintained or communicated to them. The court examined the University's ordinances and regulations regarding attendance and found that while attendance requirements are valid, the denial of examination forms without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice. The court also noted that the right to education is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and that the University's action was arbitrary and unreasonable. The court allowed the petitions and directed the University to accept the examination forms and permit the students to appear for the examinations, subject to compliance with other requirements. The court also directed the University to frame a policy for giving notice and hearing to students before denying examination forms on the ground of attendance shortage.

Headnote

A) University Law - Attendance Requirement - Denial of Examination Forms - Natural Justice - The University of Mumbai and its affiliated colleges denied students the right to appear for examinations due to shortage of attendance without giving them an opportunity of hearing - The court held that such denial without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice - The court directed the University to accept the examination forms and permit the students to appear for the examinations (Paras 1-42).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the University of Mumbai and its affiliated colleges can deny students the right to appear for examinations solely on the ground of shortage of attendance without affording them an opportunity of hearing, and whether such denial violates principles of natural justice and the right to education.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the University of Mumbai and the college to accept the examination forms of the petitioners and permit them to appear for the examinations, subject to compliance with other requirements. The court also directed the University to frame a policy for giving notice and hearing to students before denying examination forms on the ground of attendance shortage.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Right to education
  • Attendance requirement
  • University regulations
  • Writ jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015:BHC-AS:15713-DB

Writ Petition No. 3776 of 2015 with connected matters

2015-07-10

2015:BHC-AS:15713-DB

Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Swaraj S. Jadhav for the Petitioners; Ms. Prachi Tatke a/w Ms. Kavita P. Srivastav Sharan, Ambika P. Singh, Urjita Badhake, Ms. Manorama Mohanty, i/by M/s. S.K. Srivastav & Co. for Respondent Nos. 3 to 5; Mr. R.A. Rodrigues a/w Ms. Pranali Dixit for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

Preeti Mulji Sondarwa & Ors., Pratik Prakash Kadu & Ors., Nishant N. Joshi & Anr., Shreya Shah & Ors., Maitri Anil Shah, Titiksha N. Gandhi & Ors., Sandeep Vora & Ors.

The Controller of Examinations, University of Mumbai; The Vice Chancellor, University of Mumbai; Dr. Sunil Mantri, The Principal, SVKM's Narsee Monjee College of Commerce and Economics; SVKM's Narsee Monjee College of Commerce and Economics; The Convener, Attendance Committee

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the denial of examination forms by the University of Mumbai and its affiliated college on the ground of shortage of attendance.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought a direction to the respondents to accept their examination forms and permit them to appear for the examinations.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were denied examination forms due to alleged shortage of attendance without being given an opportunity of hearing.

Issues

Whether the denial of examination forms to students on the ground of shortage of attendance without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice? Whether the University's action in denying examination forms is arbitrary and violative of the right to education under Article 21 of the Constitution of India?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that they were not given any prior notice or opportunity of hearing before the decision to deny examination forms was taken, and that the attendance records were not properly maintained or communicated to them. The respondents argued that the attendance requirement is a valid regulation and that the students were aware of the requirement, and that the denial was based on objective records.

Ratio Decidendi

The denial of examination forms to students without affording them an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice. The right to education is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and any action that deprives a student of the right to appear for examinations must be preceded by a fair procedure.

Judgment Excerpts

The court held that the denial of examination forms without affording an opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice. The court directed the University to accept the examination forms and permit the students to appear for the examinations.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the denial of examination forms. The court heard the matters and delivered a common judgment on 10 July 2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Students' Petitions Against University for Denying Exam Forms Due to Attendance Shortfall — University Directed to Accept Forms and Permit Students to Appear for Exams. The court held that denial of examination forms withou...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Conductor in MSRTC Misappropriation Case. Labour Court's refusal to interfere with punishment of dismissal for collecting Rs.14/- but issuing Rs.5/- ticket and having cash excess of Rs.11/- is confirmed as n...