Search Results for "limited review"

3925 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3925 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Arbitral Award on Royalty Reimbursement. Award's Interpretation of 'Any Further Increase' Clause as Covering Royalty Charges Upheld as Reasonable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), a Government of Maharashtra undertaking, had awarded a contract for four-laning of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petitions Filed by Municipal Corporation for Lack of Error Apparent. Scope of review is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

The Coimbatore Municipal Corporation filed three review applications (Review Application Nos.83, 84 & 85 of 2026) under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument of merits not permitted.

The petitioner, Arun Bhaduji Bansod, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking review of an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Review Petition Against Order Directing Appointment of Teacher; Emphasizes Limited Scope of Review. Management Argued Error Apparent on Record as Teacher Allegedly Not Full-Time and Post Reserved, but Court Recalls Review Not Appeal and Error Must Be Self-Evident.

The review application arose from a writ petition filed by a teacher seeking regularization as Lecturer in English. The High Court had earlier allowed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Review Petition in TNPSC Recruitment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review petition against order in WP No.14812 of 2024 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, V.Arun Kumar, filed a review petition (REV.APLW No. 77 of 2026) before the Madras High Court seeking to review the order dated 31.7.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Review Application in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with findings does not warrant review.

The present application was filed by the heirs of deceased Mahendrabhai Lallubhai Patel and others (original petitioners/defendants) under Section 114...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC dismissed as petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or discovery of new evidence.

The judgment pertains to two review petitions filed by Sri. Prakash Gangaram (represented by GPA holder Sri. Subbaramaiah) against the Deputy Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Pleas That Exhibits Showing Sale Deed and Award from Other Villages Were Not Properly Appreciated Not Grounds for Review Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case concerned a review petition filed by Baswareddy against the judgment and order dated 25.02.2013 in MFA No.30912/2012 passed by the High Court...