KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "incorrect particulars"
1000 result(s) found
Found 1000 result(s)
High Court
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Election Petition Rejection Application — Material Particulars Sufficiently Disclosed. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Rejection Not Warranted When Election Petition Contains Necessary Allegations of Non-Disclosure in Nomination Form.
22 Mar 2018The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ashok Rajaram Raul (the applicant) against an order dated 5 December 2017 passed by the 6th Jo...
- 80
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.
16 Feb 2026The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...
- 26
High Court
- 53
High Court
KAHC010059832012_1
21 Jun 2016The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Strikes Out Pleadings in Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Triable Issue — False Affidavit Allegations Under Section 33A of Representation of People Act, 1951. The court held that vague allegations of false or incomplete affidavit without specifying details do not disclose a cause of action and are liable to be struck off under Order 6 Rule 16 CPC.
17 Feb 2011The judgment pertains to an application filed by the original respondent in an election petition seeking to strike out certain paragraphs from the pet...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Government Order Rejecting Correction of Date of Birth, Directs Recording of Correct Date. Limitation Plea Rejected as Petitioner Proved Correct Date with Documentary Evidence and Applied Promptly After Discovering Error in Service Book.
22 Apr 2016The petitioner joined government service as a lecturer through MPSC in 1984. His service book, initially held by the Accountant General, was transferr...
- 22
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)
17 Mar 2023The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...
- 15
