Search Results for "enabling proviso"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition in Maintenance Execution Case — Offer to Maintain After Final Order Not Permissible. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invoked After Final Maintenance Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Seeking to Offer Maintenance After Final Order Under Section 125(1) CrPC. Second Proviso to Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Apply in Execution Proceedings After Maintenance Order Has Become Final.

The petitioner, Shivaji Tukaram Davargave, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the orders of the Magistrate and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC — Condonation of Delay Granted. The court held that the victim's right to appeal is independent and delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown.

The petitioner, Parbhani District Central Bank Ltd., through its Assistant Manager Digambar s/o Madanrao Parve, filed a criminal writ petition challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Furlough Rule Denying Furlough to Prisoners from Outside Maharashtra. Classification Based on Residence Held Reasonable Under Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Forward Contract Prohibition; Contracts Void Under Section 3 of Travancore-Cochin Public Safety Measures Act 5 of 1950. Pre-Constitution Bill Did Not Require President’s Sanction Under Article 304(b) as No Amendment Covered by Article Was Moved.

The dispute arose from forward contracts for the purchase of coconut oil entered into in 1952 in the former Cochin State. The respondent, a commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...