Search Results for "distributed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distributed"

1021 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1021 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in TDR Case — Principle of Land Division Proportionate to Built-Up Area Applicable When TDR Distributed Across Layout. The Court set aside the Competent Authority's order granting conveyance of 929.84 sq.mtrs and remanded for fresh consideration under Section 11(3) of MOFA, holding that GR dated 22 June 2018 does not mandate conveyance of only plinth and appurtenant area.

25 Jun 2026

The Petitioner, Neelkanth Mansions & Infrastructure Private Limited, is a developer of a large integrated project named 'Neelkanth Greens' at Majiwada...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.

27 Apr 2026

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trust Petition for Distribution of Undistributed Funds Under Will — Failure of Bequest to Wife Does Not Entitle Petitioner to Funds as Residuary Bequest to Charity Takes Effect. Clause 7 of Will Only Operates on Failure of Bequest to Wife, But Amount Then Goes to Charity Under Clause 5, Not to Petitioner.

22 Jun 2005

The present trust petition was filed by Devishankar S/o Ganga Prasad Ram Narayan Tripathi & Ors. seeking distribution of undistributed funds under Cla...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Dividend in Liquidation Under Section 2(6A)(c) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Distribution on Liquidation Attributed to Accumulated Profits to be Determined on the Basis of Accumulated Profits Immediately Before Liquidation.

7 Oct 1966

The respondent company was placed under voluntary winding up by resolution dated August 23, 1952. Its paid-up capital was Rs. 25 lakhs and accumulated...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Lottery Ticket Commission TDS Case — Difference Between Face Value and Sale Price Not 'Commission' Under Section 194G of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that trade discount given to agents/dealers for encouraging sale of lottery tickets does not amount to commission requiring tax deduction at source, and thus no liability under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) arises.

9 Apr 2026

The case involves a tax dispute between the Commissioner of Income Tax, Coimbatore (petitioner) and M/s Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd (respondent/assess...

High Court

Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.

7 Aug 2018

The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal: Capital Gains Excluded from Dividend Under Section 2(6A) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Assessee's Share of Dividend Derived from Capital Gains Held Not Taxable as Dividend Due to Express Exclusion in the Proviso to Explanation to Section 2(6A)(a).

25 Jul 1969

The case involved assessment year 1949-50 where respondent shareholders received dividends from a company and claimed that the portion distributed out...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision on Deduction of Cumulative Preference Dividends in Section 104 Case. Only Previous Year's Dividend Deductible in Computing Undistributed Income Liable to Additional Income-tax.

30 Sep 2005

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue, arising from an order of the Income-ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Fair Price Shop Licence Cancellation Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Interference with Concurrent Findings. The court held that the Additional Commissioner erred in setting aside the cancellation of licence and allotment without hearing the petitioner, and that the revisional authority ought not to have interfered with concurrent findings of fact based on material on record.

24 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Baburao Dnyandevrao Pawar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, dated 20.11.1991, w...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)