Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3026 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3026 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Union of India in Arbitration Dispute — Claim for Excess Timber Supply Held to Be Within Scope of Arbitration Clause. Recourse to Contract Necessary to Determine Claim, Confirming Arbitral Jurisdiction Under Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appeal arose from a contract between the Union of India and Salween Timber Construction (India) for the supply of teak logs. A dispute emerged whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition - ONGC Challenges Umpire’s Award Granting Six Days’ Extension in Pipeline Project. Petition contends that the extension was granted in breach of contract clauses 5.9 and 41.8 and without evidence, after rejecting the related claim for cost of repairs.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 6 November 1989 between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) as employer and a consortium of foreign...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.238 OF 2019

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li...