Search Results for "different marketable product"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "different marketable product"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

8 Apr 2025

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Exemption for Warehousing of Tea as Agricultural Produce under GST. Tea stored in 50 kg bags after standard processing is 'agricultural produce' eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

11 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of warehousing, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

24 Jun 2014

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Stabilisation of Crude Oil Not 'Manufacture' Under Central Excise Act, 1944. The process of stabilising crude oil on process platforms does not amount to manufacture and stabilised crude oil is not excisable goods.

1 Mar 2013

The appellant, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC), operates oil wells and process platforms in Mumbai Offshore. The extracted gas-oil mix ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case, Upholds MODVAT Credit for Purification and Filtration of Acids. Processes of purification and filtration of Hydrochloric Acid and Sulphuric Acid, though not causing chemical change, amount to manufacture under Central Excise Act, 1944 as they are incidental and ancillary to making the product marketable.

24 Aug 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise & Custom, Thane-I, appealed against the order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)