Search Results for "decomposed body"

148 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 148 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Appeals Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Evidence of Sole Eyewitness and Medical Evidence Required Re-appreciation in Light of Trial Court's Findings.

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, heard two criminal appeals against the acquittal of six accused persons by the Trial Court in a case of al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal from Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Accused for Murder and Destruction of Evidence After Establishing Deceased's Identity Through DNA Test.

The appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Shimoga, in S.C. No.95/2012 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Rehears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Robbery After Remand by Supreme Court. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recoveries Challenged Under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The matter originated from the murder of Smt. Chukibai, a 68-year-old pawnbroker residing alone at Chamarajpet, Bengaluru. On 12.05.1991, accused No.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Anandrao @ Anil Baban Kharade and Vijay Hiraman Bahare, were convicted by the adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay at Sewre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Channappa @ Channu @ Channya Gangannawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Margao for the murder of Renuka, the wife o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, dated 27-6-2013 in Sessions Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Girl. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 IPC, finding the case to be rarest of rare.

The case pertains to the confirmation of a death sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge at Nashik on the respondent-accused, Pappu Suresh S...