Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Girl. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 IPC, finding the case to be rarest of rare.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to the confirmation of a death sentence imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge at Nashik on the respondent-accused, Pappu Suresh Salve @ Sunil Bharat Jadhav, for the murder of a minor girl, Nikita. The accused was employed by the complainant, Mangesh Jadhav, who ran a hotel and video parlour. On 31 October 2003, the complainant slapped the accused for negligence in duties. That evening, the complainant's daughter Nikita went missing. A missing complaint was lodged, and later an FIR was registered on 2 November 2003, naming the accused and his wife. During investigation, a headless dead body was recovered from a well on 26 November 2003, identified as Nikita. The accused was convicted under Sections 363, 302, and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to death. The High Court, in confirmation proceedings under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, examined the evidence and found the case to fall within the rarest of rare category, confirming the death sentence. The court noted that the accused had kidnapped and murdered a minor girl in a brutal manner, and the sentence was appropriate.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Confirmation of Death Sentence - Section 366 CrPC - Rarest of Rare Cases - The High Court considered whether the death sentence imposed by the trial court for the murder of a minor girl should be confirmed. The court examined the evidence and found the case to fall within the rarest of rare category, confirming the death sentence. (Paras 1-2)

B) Criminal Law - Kidnapping and Murder - Sections 363, 302 IPC - Circumstantial Evidence - The accused was convicted for kidnapping and murdering a minor girl based on circumstantial evidence, including last seen together, recovery of the body, and motive. The court upheld the conviction. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the death sentence imposed on the respondent-accused for the murder of a minor girl should be confirmed under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court confirmed the death sentence imposed on the respondent-accused for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 302 of IPC and Section 201 read with Section 34 of IPC.

Law Points

  • Confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 CrPC
  • Conviction under Sections 363
  • 302
  • 201 IPC
  • Rarest of rare doctrine
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2010 LawText (BOM) (04) 48

Confirmation Case No. 3 of 2008 in Sessions Case No. 47 of 2004

2010-04-13

B.H. Marlapalle, A. A. Sayed

H.J. Dedhia (APP for State), M.S. Mohite, S.B. Bhosale, Sharmila Kaushik, A.R. Kapadnis (for Respondent)

State of Maharashtra

Pappu Suresh Salve @ Sunil Bharat Jadhav

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Confirmation of death sentence imposed on respondent-accused

Filing Reason

Trial court imposed death sentence subject to confirmation by High Court

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted respondent-accused under Sections 363, 302, 201 IPC and sentenced to death on 27 November 2008

Issues

Whether the death sentence should be confirmed under Section 366 CrPC

Submissions/Arguments

State argued for confirmation of death sentence Respondent argued against confirmation

Ratio Decidendi

The case falls within the rarest of rare category, warranting confirmation of death sentence for the brutal kidnapping and murder of a minor girl.

Judgment Excerpts

This confirmation case submitted under section 366 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arises from the order of conviction passed on 27th November, 2008, in Sessions Case No. 47 of 2004 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Nashik. The respondent-accused No.1 has been convicted for the offences punishable under sections 363 and 302 of IPC and section 201 r/w section 34 of IPC.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the respondent-accused on 27 November 2008 in Sessions Case No. 47 of 2004 and sentenced him to death, subject to confirmation by the High Court under Section 366 CrPC. The State submitted the confirmation case to the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 366
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 363, 302, 201, 34, 202
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Kidnapping and Murder of Minor Girl. The court upheld the conviction under Sections 363, 302, and 201 IPC, finding the case to be rarest of rare.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Preliminary Objection in Industrial Dispute - Settlement Bars Reference. The Court held that the existence of a binding settlement must be decided as a preliminary issue befor...