Search Results for "damaged consignment"

28 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Short Delivery Case. Railway Claims Tribunal's Award of Compensation for Short Delivery of B.P. Sheets Upheld as Appellant Failed to Prove Absence of Negligence Under Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the judgment and order dated 3.6.1996 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal in Case No. OC 9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods.

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim for Short-Landed Cargo Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove that the consignment was loaded on board the vessel and that the suit was barred by limitation under the Indian Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, Wallace Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of US$154,000 representing the CIF value of 40 drums of Lincomycin HCL BP ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Defence Transport Contract Dispute. Contractor Held Liable for Loss Despite Alleged Insistence by Respondent on Unsuitable Trailer.

The petitioner, Shiv Ganga Transport Private Limited, entered into a contract with the respondent, the President of India through the Commandant, Emba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Railway Claims Case — Claim for Non-Delivery of Onions Held Time-Barred Under Section 78B of Railways Act, 1890. Notice of Claim Given After Six Months from Date When Delivery Ought to Have Taken Place, Hence Claim Not Maintainable.

The appellant, Union of India, represented by the General Managers of Central and Northern Railways, appealed against the judgment and decree of the R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Carrier for Short Delivery of Goods Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Limitation. Bill of Lading Holder Cannot Sue Carrier When Goods Were Delivered to Consignee Without Endorsement of Original Bill of Lading.

The plaintiff, M/s. J. Harkishandas & Co., a partnership firm, filed a suit against the first defendant, Lloyd Triestino, a foreign shipping company, ...