Search Results for "continuous officiation"

40 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Direct Recruit Deputy Collectors and State of Uttarakhand in Seniority Dispute. Promotee Deputy Collectors Cannot Claim Seniority from Ad Hoc Appointment Date as Appointments Were Not in Accordance with Rules Under Uttaranchal Civil Services (Executive Branch) Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals arising from a seniority dispute between direct recruit and promotee Deputy Collectors in the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Seniority in CGHS Promotion Dispute. Seniority Determined by Date of Regular Appointment, Not Ad Hoc Promotion, Under Central Civil Services Rules.

The petitioner, Arjun Sopan Gaikwad, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on 16 October 1978 and promoted to Upper Division Clerk on 9 April 1984. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Seniority Dispute for Headmaster Post Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act. Seniority Determined by Date of Appointment in Category, Not Date of Acquiring Higher Qualification.

The case involves a dispute over seniority for promotion to the post of Headmaster in a private school in Maharashtra. The appellant, Madhavi, was app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Seniority Based on Earlier Appointment Date — D.Ed. Pay Scale Does Not Affect Seniority. Education Officer's Order Quashed for Ignoring Petitioner's Appointment on 03.07.1997.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dhananjay Pachpole, was appointed as an Assistant teacher on 03.07.1997 in Vikas Vidhyalaya, Satod, run by Gramin Shikshan Mand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Seniority Dispute Among Teachers — Continuous Officiation from Date of Acquiring Prescribed Qualification is Criterion. Petitioner who possessed H.Sc. D.Ed on appointment date held senior over respondent who acquired B.Ed later.

The petitioner, Satish Ramchandra Kamdi, and respondent No.5, Ankush Kothiramji Wase, were both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a middle school run...