Search Results for "concealment"

748 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 748 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Maintenance to Wife Under Section 125 CrPC. Husband Cannot Deny Maintenance to Second Wife Who Was Unaware of His First Marriage.

The petitioner, Bandu @ Narayan Ramchandra Gote, challenged two orders granting maintenance to his wife, Tulsabai, under Section 125 of the Code of Cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation of Probate Petition for Lack of Just Cause Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Court holds that mere existence of other legal heirs does not constitute fraud when probate was granted after due citation and without objection.

The case involves a petition for revocation of probate filed by Dinesh Madhukar Parshetye (the petitioner) under Section 263(b) of the Indian Successi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for Concealment of Income in Income Tax Reference. Minimum penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 sustained for suppression of net profit of Rs.9,11,521/-.

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings for the Assessment Year 1987-8...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition in Contempt Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts. Litigant Found Guilty of Attempting to Pollute Stream of Justice by Concealing Facts and Filing Fabricated Documents, Not Entitled to Relief Under Tainted Hands Doctrine.

The Supreme Court addressed a case involving a litigant's attempt to pollute the administration of justice through suppression of material facts. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Concealment of Facts Found. Tribunal's cancellation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as assessee had disclosed all material facts regarding property sale and reinvestment.

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had cancelled the penalty imposed on the assessee under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Set Aside as Surrender of Income Was to Buy Peace, Not Concealment. Stock Difference Detected During Survey Was Not Deliberately Concealed and Related to Earlier Assessment Year.

The appellant-assessee, a partnership firm running a bar and restaurant, was subjected to a survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Concealment Found. Tribunal's cancellation of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as assessee had disclosed all material facts and claimed deduction under Section 54F in good faith.

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 21/03/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...