Search Results for "compulsion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "compulsion"

659 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 659 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Third-Party Purchaser Seeking Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance — Plaintiff Cannot Be Compelled to Implead Stranger Against Wish Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The Court held that a third party claiming independent title cannot be added in a suit for specific performance as it would enlarge the scope of the suit.

17 Jul 2019

The appellant, Gurmit Singh Bhatia, purchased a suit property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance filed by the original plaintiffs ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Convictions Under Section 326 IPC Based on Compromise Between Parties. Non-compoundable Offences Can Be Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC When Dispute is Private and Settled, Following Principles from Gian Singh and Laxmi Narayan Cases.

29 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court considered two criminal appeals involving convictions under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, which is a non-compoundable ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Narco Analysis Order Against Accused in Bank Fraud Case — Consent Not Voluntary and Violates Article 20(3). Narco analysis without free consent amounts to testimonial compulsion under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.

3 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Mrs. Rajeshree Aman Hemani, was an accused in Criminal Case No.19 of 2005 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, arising out of...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Government Order Directing Withdrawal of Criminal Cases Under Section 321 CrPC — Violation of Public Prosecutor's Independent Discretion. The court held that the State Government cannot compel Public Prosecutors to withdraw cases; the power under Section 321 CrPC must be exercised independently by the prosecutor.

29 May 2025

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled with the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a public interest petition challenging Government Order No.HD 129 MHB...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in SC/ST Act Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Court Invoked Article 142 Powers to Override Non-Compoundability Under Section 320 Cr.P.C., Holding That Genuine Settlement in Private Dispute Warrants Quashing When Appeal is Pending.

25 Oct 2021

The dispute originated from a property conflict between neighbors, Ramawatar and Prembai, which escalated into an incident on June 26, 1994, where Ram...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Compulsory Service Bonds of ESIC Medical Students; Questions Validity Under ESI Act and Constitution

6 Apr 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

26 Apr 2012

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act, 2012 set aside as medical evidence did not support penetration and delay in FIR was unexplained.

16 Jan 2020

The appellant, Ganesh Kisan Navale, was convicted by the Special Judge under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO) for sex...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

22 Apr 2022

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)