Search Results for "composite decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "composite decree"

328 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 328 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Suit Over Decree Interpretation - Executing Court Erred in Considering Pleadings to Include Loan Amount. Decree Based on Email Dated 28.03.2019 for Sale of 50% Shareholding with Consideration of ₹36.75 Crores Exclusive of Loan, as Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

21 Feb 2023

The dispute originated from a joint venture agreement in 2017 between two groups, Agrawals and Kotharis, to operate a multi-specialty hospital in Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Execution — Consent Decree Not a Nullity Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. Court Holds That Undertakings Given to Court Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn and Execution Proceedings Are Continuation of Suit.

13 Jul 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the original Judgment Debtor No.2 (Firoz A Nadiadwala) and his proprietary firm Base Industries Group see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Arrest of Judgment Debtor in Execution of Foreign Decree — Conversion Rate for Decretal Amount Must Be Determined Before Arrest. The court held that before ordering arrest under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, the exact amount payable in Indian rupees must be ascertained when the decree is in foreign currency.

13 Aug 2013

The Bombay High Court dealt with three chamber summons arising out of execution proceedings of a foreign decree. The original suit was filed in Englan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree on Admission in Construction Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Claim Amount Based on Defendant's Admissions. Unequivocal Admission of Liability Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC Leads to Decree for Final Bill Amount with Interest.

14 Feb 2020

The plaintiff, a partnership firm, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,07,88,000/- with interest against the defendant, a government-owned company, for...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Two Appeals are Required When a Suit and Counterclaim are Disposed of by a Single Judgment. The Court Analyzed Conflicting High Court Decisions on the Maintainability of a Single Appeal Against a Composite Decree and Noted a Cleavage of Opinion.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute over property rights wherein a suit for partition and injunction and a counterclaim for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

28 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Set Aside Consent Divorce Decree in Matrimonial Dispute — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent terms recorded by Family Court under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 are binding and cannot be unilaterally rescinded.

2 Feb 2023

The judgment arises from two miscellaneous civil applications filed by Vijay Suryakant Kakade and Jay Suryakant Kakade (applicants) seeking to set asi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff to Abandon Part of Claim in Suit for Salary and Declaration, Holding Right Under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC Is Unfettered Even at Appellate Stage. The court held that the plaintiff's unconditional right to abandon a part of claim under Order XXIII Rule 1(1) CPC cannot be resisted by the defendant, and the District Judge erred in rejecting the application on grounds of prejudice.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Pandurang Rajaram Inamdar, was employed as Senior Vice President – Banking with the respondent, Accelya Solution India Private Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons for Leave to Execute UK Judgment for Costs Against Judgment Debtor. Applicability of Section 44A CPC and Mandatory Notice Requirement under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC Considered.

5 Jun 2006

The matter arose from a Chamber Summons in execution proceedings before the Bombay High Court, seeking leave to execute a foreign judgment and costs c...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

24 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)