Search Results for "batai cultivation"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Orders Rejecting Tenant's Application for Restoration of Possession of Agricultural Land Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act. Court Holds Application Filed on 19 February 1970 Was Within Two-Year Limitation Period from Sale Deed Dated 20 February 1968 and Dispossession in June 1968.

The dispute involved agricultural land bearing Survey No.27 at Chincholi Nakub, Kannad, Aurangabad, where the father of the petitioners was a protecte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Concurrent Orders Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenant Status. Landlord's Application for Possession Under Section 32-O Allowed as Tenant Could Not Establish Cultivation After Tillers' Day.

The petitioner, Shri Ananda Sakharam Padalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Agricultural Land Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute. Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948; Sale Deed Held Invalid as Tenant Was in Possession.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Maharudrappa Baslingappa Swami, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Agricultural Land Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings Upheld. Patta Validity Requires Proof of Abandonment or Revocation of Earlier Patta Under Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal arising from a land title dispute in Madhya Pradesh. The respondents-plaintiffs (Shiv Nath and deceased Vishwana...