Search Results for "authorised dealer"

221 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 221 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Whether an Authorised Dealer Compliant with RBI's FLM Instructions Can Be Held Liable under Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of FERA; Maintainability Not Disputed Despite Co-Noticees' Failure to Appeal.

This matter concerns two appeals filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the High Court of Bombay, challenging an order of the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Sales Tax Case on Handling Charges. Handling charges for registration of motor cycles are not part of sale price under Section 2(25) of MVAT Act, 2002.

The Revenue appealed against an order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which set aside tax on handling charges collected by the respondent, a dea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cancellation of Fair Price Shop Authorization Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's authorization cancelled without notice or opportunity of hearing, and appellate order also set aside for lack of proper consideration.

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath, was a fair price shop dealer authorized under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. His authorization was cancelled by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions in Fair Price Shop Authorization Dispute — Sets Aside Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Appointment of Fair Price Shop Dealer Quashed as Selection Was Made Without Considering All Eligible Candidates and Without Proper Notice.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by T. Ramesh and M.T. Rangappa concerning the authorization of a fair price shop dealership in Hosakote vil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Orders Against Corporate Dealers in KVAT Cases; Holds Inter-Branch Transfers Not Taxable as Sale. Branch Registration Under Section 38(6) Does Not Create Separate Legal Personality for Levy of VAT.

The batch of writ petitions was filed by corporate entities, including M/s Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd and M/s Chamundeshwari Build Tech Pvt. Ltd, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Penalty Under Central Sales Tax Act for Alleged Misuse of Declared Forms. Court holds that penalty under Section 10(d) read with Section 10A of the CST Act, 1956 cannot be imposed without establishing mens rea or conscious violation of law.

The petitioner, M/s. Brijda Roadlines Pvt. Ltd., a transport company engaged in the business of transporting goods and holding a dealership from Bhara...