Search Results for "assessment year 2004-2005"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "assessment year 2004-2005"

16 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officers in Public Interest — Screening Committee's Evaluation Not Arbitrary or Perverse. Rule 74(b)(ii) of Jharkhand Service Code, 2001, allows compulsory retirement after 30 years of service or 50 years of age in public interest; court found no mala fides or perversity in the decision.

27 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by erstwhile judicial officers of Jharkhand challenging their compulsory retirement under Rule 74...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Assessment Orders Under BST Act — Holds That Tribunal's Order Dated 20/01/2015 Has Prospective Effect Only. The assessing authority acted without jurisdiction in passing assessment orders for 2013-14 contrary to the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2015.

18 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Industries Ltd. and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction Under Section 80IB(10) for Housing Project Despite Prior Construction on Same Plot — Conditions of Commencement After 1-10-1998 and Approval After That Date Satisfied for New Building 'E'. The court held that each building can be a separate housing project if approved after the cutoff date, and the assessee is eligible for deduction.

28 Mar 2012

The case involves two appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing deduction under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Deduction Under Section 80IB for Assessee Engaged in Manufacture Through Job Workers. Workers Supplied by Contractor Count Towards Employee Requirement Under Section 80IB(2)(iv).

15 Nov 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed deduction under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging CBDT Condition of Applying 75% Income for Educational Purposes in India Under Section 10(23C)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Condition held valid but directed to be applied prospectively from assessment year 2010-2011, with stay on recovery of tax demands for earlier years subject to furnishing of security.

30 Jun 2010

The petitioner, American Hotel & Lodging Educational Institute, a non-profit organization established in the United States with a branch in India, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment for UK Insurance Company in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 based on mere change of opinion without new tangible material is invalid.

29 Apr 2010

The petitioner, The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd., a UK-incorporated insurance company registered as a sub-account of a Foreign Institutional Inve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Rule 8 Loss Set-Off Held Invalid. The court held that Rule 8 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 applies to both income and loss, and loss from plantation division is a business loss allowable under Rule 8.

1 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-2005 on 29 October 2004, showing net profit before tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Mere Change of Opinion Not Sufficient to Reopen Assessment After Scrutiny. The court held that reopening based on same material considered during scrutiny assessment is invalid as it amounts to a change of opinion.

4 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rallis India Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-2005 declaring a loss of Rs.52.87 crores, which included a d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessments Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material — Deduction Under Section 80IB Allowed After Scrutiny in Original Assessment. Reopening Based on Same Facts Already Examined Under Section 143(3) Amounts to Change of Opinion and Is Invalid.

8 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Purity Techtextile Private Limited, challenged the reopening of its income tax assessments for Assessment Years 2003-2004 and 2004-200...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)