KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "advance forfeiture"
176 result(s) found
Found 176 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SAFEMFOPA Forfeiture Orders — Upholds Appellate Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay. The court held that the Appellate Tribunal under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 has no power to condone delay beyond the statutory period of 60 days.
6 Jul 2026The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Appellate Trib...
- 55
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture — Petitioner's Share Not Illegally Acquired Property. Court holds that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA cannot extend to property acquired by the petitioner from independent sources, not traceable to the detenu's illegal activities.
2 Apr 2026The case involves a writ petition filed by Zahida Begum (since deceased, represented by her legal heirs) challenging the forfeiture of her share in a ...
- 75
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.
10 Feb 2025The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...
- 1118
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.
10 Apr 2023The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...
- 127
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
10 Aug 2022The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.
11 Jul 2018The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Contract for Sale of Aero-Scrap. Clause Explicitly Stipulating Deposit as Earnest Money and Forfeiture on Default Valid Under Sections 64 and 74 of Contract Act, 1872.
28 Oct 1969The dispute arose from a contract for sale of aero-scrap between the appellants, Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills, and the respondent, Tata Air-Craft Ltd. T...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tenant's Right to Relief Against Forfeiture in Transfer of Property Act Case. Appellate Court Has Jurisdiction to Grant Relief Under Section 114 Even If Tenant Failed to Comply With Trial Court's Conditions.
11 Mar 1969The dispute arose from a lease of land containing a covenant that in the event of default in payment of rent for two consecutive years, the tenancy ri...
- 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 27
