Search Results for "adhoc appointment"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Approval for Lecturer Appointment Due to Lack of Qualifications and Procedural Irregularities. University's Rejection of Adhoc Approval Upheld as Petitioner Did Not Possess NET/SET Qualification and Appointment Was Made Without Following UGC Regulations.

The petitioner, Balu Janu Kukade, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Government Engineer Seeking Antedated Promotion. Petitioner's claim for regular promotion from 2004 rejected as ad-hoc promotion in 2005 did not confer right to retrospective regularisation.

The petitioner, Shri S. Lekshmanan, was appointed as Junior Engineer (Electrical) on 04.06.1979 and promoted to Assistant Engineer on 15.07.1996. He c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Union of India and Commissioner of Central Excise Challenging CAT Order Quashing Reversion of Adhoc Promotee. Reversion of an employee promoted on adhoc basis upon revocation of suspension is illegal; employee entitled to reinstatement in promotional post.

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Central Excise filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mum...