Search Results for "Unified Guidelines 2017"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Unified Guidelines 2017"

36 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Comprehensive Accessibility Compliance for Persons with Disabilities in Public Spaces - Emphasizes Social Model of Disability and Two-Pronged Approach to Accessibility. The Court reaffirmed accessibility as a fundamental right and directed amendment of Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules to align with Section 40 of the RPWD Act.

13 Dec 2024

This judgment arises from a writ petition filed in 2005 by Rajive Raturi, a visually challenged person, seeking directions to ensure meaningful access...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Considers Challenge to LPG Distributorship Advertisement and Unified Guidelines for Selection in PESA Areas. The Court Examined Whether Petroleum Corporations Were Bound to Reserve LPG Distributorships for Scheduled Tribes Under Section 4(m)(iv) of PESA Act and Noted That Selected Candidates in Certain Open Category Locations Were Members of Scheduled Tribes.

3 Sep 2021

The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an advertisement dated 31.08.2017 and Unified...

High Court

KAHC010138832018_1

14 Jan 2019

The judgment relates to a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notifications issued by the State Government's ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Council of Architecture's Authority Over AICTE in Architectural Education Matters — Conflict Between Two Regulatory Bodies Resolved in Favor of Special Statute. The Court held that the Architects Act, 1972, being a special statute, prevails over the general AICTE Act, 1987, in matters of approval and regulation of architectural institutions.

8 Nov 2019

The case involves a conflict between two regulatory bodies: the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the Council of Architecture (CoA...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard writ petition challenging refusal of NOC and direction to obtain NOC for construction near Air Force Station. Statutory notifications under Sections 3 and 7 of Works of Defence Act, 1903 imposed restrictions only up to 100 meters, while impugned circular required NOC within 500 meters.

6 May 2021

By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a registered partnership firm engaged in real estate development...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Air India's Standing Order 17 Which Permits Termination Without Assigning Reasons. The Court Considered Whether Such Unguided Power Violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

25 Feb 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by employees of Air India Limited (formerly NACIL) whose services were terminated under Standing Ord...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Mandatory 75% Voting Share for Resolution Plan Approval Under I&B Code. Financial Creditors' Rejection of Resolution Plan for Kamineni Steel & Power India Pvt. Ltd. and Innoventive Industries Ltd. Leads to Liquidation as Plan Did Not Garner Required Majority.

6 Sep 2018

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals arising from a common judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 6 September 2018,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Allowances for Judicial Officers as Recommended by Second National Judicial Pay Commission. The Court rejected objections based on financial burden and equivalence with other government officers, holding that providing service conditions is a mandatory state duty essential for judicial functions and rule of law.

4 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, addressed objections from the Union Government and State Gove...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)