Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

310 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

High Court

Writ Petition Challenging Review Orders on MVAT Refund Adjustments Quashed by Bombay High Court. Bombay High Court invalidates review orders under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act due to lack of jurisdiction, directing refund of Rs. 2.72 crores with interest.

23 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court quashed review orders issued under Section 15 of the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Taxes Act, 2022 (Settlement Act). The ...

High Court

High Court Orders Tax Authority to Refund Rs. 10.69 Crores to Petitioner. Court rules in favor of the Petitioner, mandates refund with interest due to improper adjustment of dues.

9 Jul 2024

The case of a tax refund dispute, the Petitioner sought the refund of Rs. 10,69,89,606/- for the year 2011-2012. The Respondents had adjusted this ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Immediate Refund of Undisputed Income Tax Refund Under Section 168(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Failure to Release Admitted Refund Despite Reminders Constitutes Arbitrary Action

18 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Group M Media India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court alleging failure by the respondents (income ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Form-3 Under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 for Assessment Year 2003-2004 — Designated Authority Directed to Recompute Amount Payable After Considering Refund Already Paid. The Court held that the Designated Authority must consider refunds paid under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while computing the amount payable under the DTVSV Act, and apply the principle of set off under Section 245 of the IT Act.

25 Aug 2021

The Petitioner, Cooperative Rabobank U.A., a bank established in the Netherlands and part of the Rabobank Group, is a regular assessee under the Incom...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that denial of benefits under Para 4.1.5 of Foreign Trade Policy on ground of non-fulfillment of condition of minimum value addition is unsustainable as the condition was not applicable to the product in question.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)