Search Results for "Suo Moto Revision"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Enquiry Order Under Section 83 of MCS Act — No Pre-Decided Views Found in Registrar's Order. Appointment of Authorised Officer for Enquiry into Society's Affairs Upheld as Registrar Acted on Prima Facie Material Without Prejudging Issues.

The Petitioner, Raghuleela Megamall Kandivali (West), a cooperative society formed by occupiers of units in a mall, challenged an order dated 9 March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Land Ceiling Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Revision Application under Section 89A of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1958 held time-barred and without proper notice.

The petitioner, M/S Anchor Daewoo Industries Ltd, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Entries Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Property Rights Restored as Ex-Parte Cancellation Without Notice Held Illegal Under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, 227 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Thakkar Yogeshbhai Amritlal, filed a petition under Articles 14, 19, 300A, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging multi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Inquiry Under MCS Act — Inquiry Valid Despite Non-Compliance with Section 83 Notice Requirements. Court holds that Section 84 inquiry can be initiated without prior notice under Section 83 when there is a prima facie case of mismanagement.

The petitioner, Jayprakash Sahakari Griha Rachana Sanstha Mrt., a society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Allotment After 13 Years — Delay Unreasonable Despite No Limitation Prescribed Under UPZALR Act. Allottees Who Constructed Houses and Resided for 13 Years Have Legitimate Expectation; Suo Moto Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Period.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had upheld the cancellation of land allotment to the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Additional Commissioner's Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Issued After Eight Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Tukaram S/o Gopalrao Nakate, a resident of Hadgaon, District Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act for Delay Beyond Limitation Period. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 15 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Shaikh Ahmed, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Reopening Enquiry. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961 Cannot Be Initiated After 17 Years from Original Order.

The petitioner, Ashok Rangrao Deshmukh, a resident of Parbhani, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdin...