Search Results for "Section 220 Income Tax Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 220 Income Tax Act"

234 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest and Surcharge in Settlement Commission Order for Block Assessment Years. Held that Settlement Commission cannot levy interest under Section 220(2) and surcharge under Section 113 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for block assessment years prior to the date of search.

25 Feb 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Karia Erectors Private Limited, challenged the legality and validity of orders passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission's Reduction of Interest Under Section 220(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Settlement Commission Has Power to Reduce Interest Under Section 220(2) When Settling Case Under Chapter XIX-A, and Such Reduction Does Not Require Prior Payment of Interest.

9 Dec 2021

The Union of India and the Commissioner of Income Tax filed a writ petition challenging two orders dated 05/06/1998 and 04/08/1999 passed by the Incom...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Recovery Order Against State Agency for Exceeding 20% Limit Under Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Recovery of Rs.16,95,48,869/- for multiple assessment years held illegal as it exceeded the statutory limit of 20% pending appeal.

7 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Bidar Nirmiti Kendra, an agency of the State Government, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Interest Under Section 220(2) Held Leviable Till Final Order of Settlement Commission Under Section 245D(4). The Court set aside the Tribunal's order restricting interest till the date of admission of application under Section 245D(1).

24 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that interest u...

High Court

Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand of Entire Tax Within One Week and Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of Stay, Directs Continuation of Provisional Attachment. Proviso to Section 220(1) of Income Tax Act Could Not Be Invoked as Provisional Attachment Under Section 281B Already Adequately Protected Revenue.

26 Mar 2012

The petitioner, an assessee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection of its...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue's Appeal Partly Allowed by ITAT in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 221(1) Excludes Interest. The Court held that penalty under Section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is leviable only on the tax amount, not on interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax-8) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.

25 Mar 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Bogus Purchases Case — Upholds Profit Rate Estimation. The court held that where purchases are proved genuine except for two parties, the disallowance can be restricted to profit margin and 100% disallowance is not warranted under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

5 Mar 2025

The case involves an appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (revenue) against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal and High Court Decision That Income-Tax Officer Cannot Assess Same Income Both Individually and as Unregistered Firm. Assessment of Unregistered Firm Invalid After Option Exercised to Assess Partners Under Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 23(3).

7 Jan 1966

The dispute arose out of assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1954-55 involving three individuals, M, P and G, who carried on business in se...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)