Search Results for "Section 146"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Succession Certificate Granted to Widow and Children in Summary Proceeding Under Indian Succession Act. Concurrent findings of fact on validity of marriage cannot be interfered with under Section 115 CPC in absence of jurisdictional error or perversity.

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 384(1)(3) of the Indian Succession Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit Challenging Tahsildar's Order for Approach Road. Suit for Perpetual Injunction Not Barred Despite Exhaustion of Appeal Remedy Under Section 143(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case arises from a dispute over an approach road granted by the Nayab Tahsildar, Latur, under Section 143 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony. Trial Court's Use of Vulgar Language in Recording Testimony Strongly Deprecated.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment dated 14/08/2012 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No.19 of 2010, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Bearings as General Bearings Under Entry C-II-146 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that bearings not exclusively used in automobiles or tractors are not auto or tractor parts, applying common parlance test.

The case involves three Sales Tax References filed by M/s Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. against the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prohibitory Order Under Regulation 21 of CHALR, 2004 — No Appeal Lies to CESTAT. Regulation 22(8) of CHALR, 2004 is Not Ultra Vires the Customs Act, 1962.

The appeal arises from a decision of the CESTAT dated 2 January 2013, which held that an appeal is not maintainable against an order passed under Regu...