Search Results for "Sarla Verma multiplier"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Age Assessment and Omission of Future Prospects and Consortium. The Court Enhanced Compensation from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 8,10,000 by Taking Deceased's Age as 48 Years and Applying 25% Future Prospects.

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Baban Dethe, died in a vehicular accident. The claimants, his wife, son, and daughte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Multiplier Application. Compensation Enhanced as Multiplier Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Split Methodology, Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The legal heirs of deceased V. Rajasekaran appealed against a compensation order by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 7.11.2017, which gran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Six First Appeals on Common Issue of Multiplier in Motor Accident Cases. Multiplier to be Based on Age of Deceased and Not on Age of Claimants, and 50% Deduction for Personal Expenses of Bachelor Deceased Upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Bombay High Court was seized of six first appeals arising from awards of various Motor Accident Claims Tribunals, all involving the death of young...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Corrected from 10 to 17 and Future Prospects Added for Deceased Driver Aged 27 Years.

The appellants, widow and minor children of deceased Maruti Alhat, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 16 Based on Deceased's Age. The Court recalculated loss of dependency using multiplier 16 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, enhancing total compensation from Rs.5,27,280 to Rs.5,88,000 with 8% interest.

The appeal was filed by the claimants-appellants, being the legal representatives of the deceased K.K. Shivalingaiah, who died in a motor vehicle acci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected from 12 to 14 for Deceased Aged 42 Years. Loss of Dependency Recalculated Following Sarla Verma and Rajesh v. Rajbir Singh, Awarding Total Compensation of Rs.4,71,000.

This is an appeal by the claimants (widow and children of deceased Bhagwandas) seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim...