Search Results for "Rule 4(20)"

1230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Furlough Plea of POTA Convict and Prison Authorities' Rejection Under Amended Rules. Court Considers Whether Completion of 10-Year Sentence Under POTA Removes Disqualification Under Rule 4(13) of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules.

The petition before the Bombay High Court arose from the rejection of a furlough leave application filed on behalf of a convict, Farhan Abdul Malik Kh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Suit for Specific Performance of Family Settlement Minutes. Interim Injunction Sought to Restrain Defendants from Valuing or Buying Out Shareholding Pending Suit for Enforcement of Minutes of Discussion.

The dispute arose in the context of a family-run private limited company engaged in automobile dealerships across multiple states. The Plaintiffs and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Attachment Orders Under PMLA — Enforcement Directorate's Provisional Attachment Orders Set Aside for Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 5(1) of PMLA

The judgment concerns six criminal writ petitions filed by various individuals and companies challenging provisional attachment orders passed by the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Company Directors Due to Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC Bar. Allegations of Filing False Affidavits and Documents in Court Proceedings Required Court's Written Complaint, Not Private Complaint Under Section 156(3).

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed by Shree Hari Rice & Agro Ltd. (respondent no.1) against M/s Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. (petitioner) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Directors for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Acts Alleged Were in Official Capacity, Making Sanction Mandatory Before Prosecution.

The applicants, Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal and Mr. Hrishkesh Arvind Mafatlal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...