Search Results for "Rubber Act 1947"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Excise Duty on Rubber Users Under the Rubber Act, 1947. Levy Valid as Excise Duty on Production Can Be Collected from Users and Act Contains Sufficient Policy Guidance Against Excessive Delegation.

The case involved a challenge by Jullundur Rubber Goods Manufacturers’ Association, an association of rubber chappal manufacturers in Jullundur, Pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ESI Act Applicability to Bidi Manufacturer. Definition of Factory Under Section 2(12) ESI Act Includes Premises with Power-Aided Manufacturing Process, Home Workers Are Employees.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal, a bidi manufacturer in Kamptee, Nagpur, challenged the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Industrial Court’s Remand Order; Reinforces Fairness in Proportionate Punishment in Labor Disputes. Unfair Labor Practice in Dismissal Addressed under the Doctrine of Proportionality.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, examined a labor dispute where the petitioner, a former employee, contested his dismissal on the grounds of unfai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Domestic Enquiry for Fraudulent Cheque Book Issuance by Bank Employee. Court Considers Whether Principles of Natural Justice Were Followed in Disciplinary Proceedings Under Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.

The case concerns the disciplinary action taken by Bombay Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd. against its employee, Mohammed Saleem Shaikh. The Bank, a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Labour Court Order Holding Termination of Trainees as Unfair Labour Practice. Trainees performing regular work for over 240 days deemed permanent workmen under Model Standing Orders, termination without Section 25F compliance illegal.

The petitioners, M/s Mukand Limited and others, challenged an order of the Labour Court at Thane and the revisional order of the Industrial Court at T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of AAIFR Order Setting Aside BIFR's Exclusion of ULC Land from Sick Company's Rehabilitation Scheme. The Court Examines Whether the Remand for Modification Was Justified Under SICA and ULC Provisions.

The petitioner, Swayam Realtors and Traders LLP, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay ...