Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Railway Rates Tribunal jurisdiction"

142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Goods Overcharge Claim — Burden of Proof on Carrier for Short Delivery Under Section 73 of Railways Act, 1989. The court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for short delivery of steel rails, holding that the railway failed to prove delivery in full.

16 Aug 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (representing South Eastern Railway, Central Railway, and South Eastern Railway) against an order of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Food Corporation of India Against Railway Claims Tribunal Order Dismissing Claim for Non-Compliance of Section 80 CPC. Notice Under Section 80 CPC Not Required for Claims Before Railway Claims Tribunal as It Is Not a Civil Court.

7 Feb 2006

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a suit in the Civil Court at Jalgaon on 15.10.1981 for recovery of Rs.30,125/- due to short delivery of 241 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India in Railways Act Case — Demand Notices After Delivery Valid for Misdeclaration Under Section 66. Penal Charges for False Description of Goods Can Be Imposed at Any Stage, and the High Court Erred in Applying Provisions for Overloading to a Misdeclaration Case Under Section 66 of Railways Act, 1989.

5 Jun 2025

The dispute arose when the Indian Railways raised demand notices against several consignors for misdeclaration of goods carriage. The respondents paid...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Upholds Award of Refund and Damages for Breach of Contract. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the award of damages beyond contractual refund was justified.

30 Jun 2011

The Union of India, acting through the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of Western Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

21 Nov 2025

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Contractor in Railway Contract Dispute — Rejects Challenge Based on Excepted Matters and Delay in Raising Counterclaim. The court found no ground to interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Arbitral Tribunal had considered the contractual provisions and extensions granted by consent.

14 Jan 2011

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Petitioner) against an Arbitral Award dated 16 December 2005 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

24 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award of Compensation for Underutilization of Resources Due to Railway's Delays.

23 Dec 2005

The Union of India, representing the South-East-Central Railway, appealed against an order of the District Judge, Nagpur, refusing to set aside an arb...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)