Search Results for "Prothonotary order"

458 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Probate Schedule by Prothonotary. Prothonotary has power to allow amendment of schedule of assets in probate proceedings under Section 317 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioners, Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal and Bharat Ramanlal Gokal, filed a petition under the Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction of the Bombay Hig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Caveat in Testamentary Case — Caveators' Rights Protected Despite Procedural Lapse. Court holds that caveat filed after petition for Letters of Administration is maintainable and delay in lodging caveat can be condoned under Section 148A of CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the applicants, who are the legal heirs of Mr. Adhip Lal Barua (predeceased son of the deceased Captain M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order for Evidence Recording in Testamentary Dispute — Order Not a Judgment Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent. Preliminary Objection Upheld as Impugned Order Did Not Decide Substantive Rights of Parties.

The appeal arose from an order dated 30 August 2011 of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a testamentary matter. The background involv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Bring Legal Heirs on Record in Civil Suit — Duty of Pleader to Inform Court of Party's Death Under Order XXII Rule 10A CPC. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Application for Delay Without Considering Statutory Obligation of Pleader to Communicate Death.

The Petitioner, Ida Fernandes, was the original Plaintiff in Suit No. 9046 of 2000 pending before the Bombay City Civil Court. She filed Chamber Summo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Consent Decree Without Notice to Non-Signatory Defendants Under Order XXI Rule 22(2) CPC. Court held that notice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC can be dispensed with when judgment-debtors had notice of the consent decree and failed to comply with reciprocal obligations.

The plaintiff, Ashford Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Chamber Summons in Execution Application seeking directions to the Prothonotary to take on file a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Removes Interim Application and Treats Guardianship Petition as One under Clause XVII of Letters Patent. Disposal of Interim Application No. 1768 of 2025 on 24 April 2025 Leads to Removal from Board.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Abhay Ahuja, took up Guardianship Petition No. 8 of 2025 along with Interim Applicati...