Search Results for "Private Receiver"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Receiver's Appointment in Embezzlement Suit. Third Party Claimants Not Party to Suit Cannot Have Receiver Appointed Over Their Properties Without Trial.

The appeal arose from an order dated 5th September 2019 passed by a learned Single Judge (R.I. Chagla J.) on a motion filed by the original plaintiff ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Dismissal of Judgment Debtor's Application to Set Aside Receiver's Sale Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC. Order 21 Rule 89 Held Not Applicable to Receiver Appointed Under Section 51 CPC as Sale Not Conducted Under Order 21.

In execution of a money decree, the judgment debtor defaulted on payment of agreed instalments. The executing court, invoking Section 51 of the Code o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Application for Appointment of Receiver in Partition Suit. Notice of Motion Seeks Interim Relief for Joint Family Properties Allegedly Misappropriated by Co-Owners.

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration that he is entitled to a 1/10th share in the assets and properties of the joint family and for partition by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Court Receiver's Report and Additional Report in Land Dispute — Directs Demarcation and Removal of Encroachments. Court upholds Receiver's authority to manage suit property and take steps to protect it from unauthorized development.

The case pertains to a long-standing dispute over land survey No.34/1 and 35/3 at Panchpakhadi, Thane. The appellants had challenged a trial court ord...