Search Results for "Power Market Regulations 2010"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Power Market Regulations 2010"

463 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Oct 2015

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Jurisdictional Clash Between Forward Markets Commission and Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Over Electricity Futures Trading. The Court Considered Whether the Electricity Act, 2003 Overrides the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Whether the Power Market Regulations 2010 Framed by CERC Were Ultra Vires.

7 Feb 2011

The matter involved two writ petitions being heard together by the Bombay High Court, arising from a jurisdictional conflict between two regulatory bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds MERC Tariff Regulation Fixing Stringent Station Heat Rate for Dahanu TPS — No Discrimination Found. The Court held that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission's differentiated norms for thermal generating stations based on past performance and efficiency are valid under the Electricity Act, 2003 and National Tariff Policy, 2006.

21 Jan 2019

The appellant, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, challenged the validity of Regulation 44.2(d) of the MERC (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations 2011, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KERC Regulations on Renewable Purchase Obligation for Captive Users. Regulations Requiring Captive Power Producers to Purchase Renewable Energy or Certificates Are Within Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Apr 2014

The petitioners, The South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Davangere Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P.Nos.7603-04/2012) and Shree Renuka Sugar Mills...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

18 Feb 2022

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Companies in Electricity Regulatory Dispute - Upholds APTEL's Direction for Merits-Based Disposal of Tariff Determination and Power Purchase Agreement Approval Petitions. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Correctly Ordered State Commission to Decide Petitions on Merits After State Commission Allowed Withdrawal of One Petition and Dismissed the Other, Ensuring Statutory Functions Under Electricity Act, 2003 Are Fulfilled.

2 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute between Distribution Companies (DISCOMS) and Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (HNPCL) regarding power purcha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee Against Tariff Revision for Change in Law Under Electricity Act, 2003. Non-Allocation of Coal Linkage Despite Government Assurance Constitutes Change in Law Entitling Generating Company to Compensatory Tariff.

31 Aug 2020

The case involves a dispute between Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (JVVNL), an electricity distribution licensee in Rajasthan, and Adani Power Raj...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Electricity Procurement Dispute, Upholding High Court's Direction for Power Purchase from Successful Bidders. The Court affirmed that the Request for Proposal process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003, is binding, and the reduction of procurement quantum from 1000 MW to 500 MW was invalid, requiring adherence to original bid outcomes.

8 Jan 2024

The dispute originated from Rajasthan's initiative to procure 1000 MW of electricity through a competitive bidding process under Section 63 of the Ele...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)