Search Results for "PNB Housing Finance"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Order Due to Alternative Remedy Before DRT. Petitioner's Tenancy Rights Claim Must Be Raised Before Debts Recovery Tribunal Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The petitioner, G. Vinayaga Moorthi, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking to quash an order dated 27.07.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka disposes writ petitions filed by home loan borrowers seeking restraint and no due certificate; court issues directions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by individual home loan borrowers against the Union of India, Ministry of Finance, R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11BB of Central Excise Act, 1944. Petitioner entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date immediately after expiry of three months from receipt of refund application till date of refund.

The petitioner, M & G Global Services Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing Information Technology enabled services to its group entities located outside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging E-Auction Sale Due to Alternate Remedy Under SARFAESI Act. Petitioner, as second highest bidder, alleged collusion and system malfunction but was directed to approach Debts Recovery Tribunal.

The petitioner, Radhika Rajesh Agarwal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...