Search Results for "Ostensible owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Ostensible owner"

122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Decree Declaring Sale Deed and Gift Deed Void in Property Dispute Involving KHB Lease-Cum-Sale Allotment. Court Examines Whether Subsequent Absolute Sale Deed by Housing Board Enures to Benefit of Transferee Under Section 43 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

17 Mar 2015

The litigation arose out of a dispute over a residential property allotted on lease-cum-sale basis by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to S. Ranoji R...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Attachment Under Section 60 CPC as It Was Not in Possession of Insolvent at Time of Adjudication. The Court held that upon adjudication, all property of the insolvent vests in the Official Assignee under Section 28(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and attachment before judgment does not prevent such vesting.

27 Feb 2026

The case arises from insolvency proceedings against Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent). The Official Assignee, representing the estate of the insolven...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

25 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Sale Deed and Power of Attorney Challenged as Fraudulent. Court finds prima facie case of fraud and misrepresentation in execution of power of attorney and subsequent sale deed, granting injunction to protect plaintiffs' ownership rights.

28 Aug 2013

The appellants/plaintiffs, Hanif Gulamali Somji and others, filed an appeal against an order of the learned VI Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nash...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Official Assignee to Sell Insolvent's Property in Insolvency Proceedings — Property Not Subject to Prior Agreement of Sale as No Valid Contract Existed. The court held that the Official Assignee has the power to sell the insolvent's property free from an alleged agreement of sale that was not valid or enforceable under the Presidency Town Insolvency Act, 1909.

27 Feb 2026

The case involves an appeal filed by the Official Assignee of the High Court of Madras, representing the estate of Arjunlal Sunderdas (the insolvent),...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Unilateral Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Act — Failure of Promoter to Execute Conveyance Within Agreed Time Entities Society to Seek Deemed Conveyance Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

9 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Jai Jalaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

5 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...

Supreme Court

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

1 Jan 1970

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Auction Sale — Upholds High Court's Finding That Auction Purchaser Was Real Owner, Not a Benami Front. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the auction purchaser was a benami for the original owner, and the suit was barred under Section 66(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

17 Mar 2020

The plaintiffs, wife and legal heirs of Govindasamy, filed a suit to set aside an auction sale of 1955 and seek possession of the suit property. The s...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)