Search Results for "Order XXX CPC"

246 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 246 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Government Contract Dispute — Substantial Compliance with Section 80 CPC Sufficient. Notice under Section 80 CPC need not be pedantically scrutinized; substantial compliance with cause of action and relief indicated is adequate.

The present appeals relate to whether a notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) has been given to the State of Tamil Nadu in term...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Application Granted as Plaintiff Was Not Given Sufficient Opportunity to Be Heard.

The appellant, Shantinath, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.306/2007 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Indi. He filed an interlocutory applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Dispute Over Possession of Properties — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Failure to Record Reasons for Dispensing with Notice Renders Ex Parte Injunction Void.

The appellant, Mr. Srinivas Adhikeshavulu Dalvai, was the defendant in a suit filed by M/s Anushka Constructions Pvt Ltd (the respondent/plaintiff) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Commercial Division of High Court of Karnataka Examines Claim of Joint Ownership in Property Attachment Objection Under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC. Dispute Concerns Whether Judgment Debtor Has Share in Self-Acquired Property of Father Despite Gift Deed Executed Prior to Attachment.

The matters arose from execution proceedings concerning two decrees obtained by related decree holders against a judgment debtor, a sole proprietor. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Suit Against Unserved Defendant Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Failure to Serve Summons on Defendant No.1(c) Despite Court Directions and Lapse of Over Three Years Justifies Dismissal; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Invoking Section 151 CPC.

The petitioner/plaintiff filed R.A.D. Suit No.600 of 2005 before the Small Causes Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of tenancy/deemed tenancy in re...