Search Results for "Notice Requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Notice Requirement"

8720 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8720 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Lease Termination Case Due to Procedural Non-Compliance. Lease Termination Invalid as State Failed to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Remedy Default Under Clause 12 of Lease Deed, 1979, and Assignment to Partnership Firm Did Not Constitute Breach Under Clause 14.

3 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from the State of Kerala's termination of a lease agreement concerning 246.26 acres of forest land, initially auctioned in 1953...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Rent Control Case — Notice Requirement Under Section 21(1)(a) Proviso of U.P. Rent Control Act Can Be Satisfied by Oral or Written Notice, No Mandatory Mode Prescribed. The Court restored the eviction order, holding that the High Court erred in reversing concurrent findings on notice and comparative hardship.

20 Jul 2020

The appellant, Mohd. Asif Naseer, purchased a shop (Shop No.64) in Lucknow via registered sale deed dated 29.10.2004. The respondent, West Watch Compa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Mortgage Dispute — Section 164 Notice Not Required When Suit Filed Against Non-Member. Purchaser of property not a member of cooperative society is not required to serve notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act before filing suit for injunction against the society.

12 Aug 2014

The appellant, Gajanan Eknath Sonankar, purchased agricultural land Gat No. 83 admeasuring 2 Acres at Mouja Lasura Bk., Tq. Shegaon, Dist. Buldhana by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment for Non-Compliance with Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) set aside as notice of meeting did not contain proposed amendment.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sadguru University CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) of the respondent society, Sadguru Premi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Municipal Officers in Obstruction Removal Case. Laying tiles over a municipal drain is an obstruction under Section 269 of the Municipal Councils Act, 1965, and officers acting in good faith are protected from personal liability under Section 487.

13 Nov 2006

The applicants, Shrikrishna Haribhau Gore and others, filed a suit for damages of Rs.12,360/- against the respondents, officers of the Sangli Municipa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Eviction Suit Based on Lease of Open Plot - Decree No.43525 Applicable, No Notice Required. The court held that the landlord-tenant relationship is governed by Decree No.43525, which does not require a notice before filing an eviction suit for a lease of an open plot created after its extension.

16 Sep 2005

The case involves a second appeal by the plaintiff/landlord against the dismissal of his eviction suit. The plaintiff owned land at Betim, Goa, and by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

24 Nov 2021

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Petitioner in MRTP Act Violation for Non-Restoration of Toilet Block — Notice Not Served to Petitioner as Required Under Section 53(1)(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The court held that the requirement of notice is a condition precedent for prosecution, and without it, the process against the petitioner is not maintainable.

10 Feb 2005

The petitioner, D.N. Punamiya, challenged the issuance of process against him by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 41st Court, Mumbai, in Criminal ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that failure to send notice to the correct address of the drawer within the prescribed period renders the complaint not maintainable and amounts to abuse of process.

9 Oct 2020

The case involves two criminal petitions filed by the petitioners (accused) under Sections 428 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat Adyaksha and Upadyaksha — Motion Valid Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 as No Prior Notice Required for Special Meeting Convened by Prescribed Authority

1 Jul 2020

The petitioners, who are members of Somaguddi Gram Panchayat, filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Adyaksha (...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)