Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

675 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 675 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.

The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Modification of Development Plan Under MRTP Act for Non-Compliance with Section 31(3) and Section 37. The court held that modification of land reservation from educational to residential is substantial and requires notice and hearing.

The petitioner, Modern Education Society, Vita, a registered public trust engaged in educational activities, challenged a part of the notification dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging State's Refusal to Modify Development Plan Reservation. State's Discretion to Revert Land to Original Reservation Upheld Under Section 37 of MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tukaram Mohite (since deceased through legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003

The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...