Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act 1963"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company in Agricultural Marketing Act Case — Processed Goods Not Covered. Notification Adding Sugar, Dry Fruits, and Edible Oils to Schedule Under Section 62 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Ultra Vires.

The petitioner, Britannia Industries Limited, a public company with its registered office in Calcutta and a branch in Bombay, filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Hears Challenge to Supersession of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963 – Issue of Prior Consultation Mandate Under Section 45(1) Raised.

The case involved a challenge to the order dated 24.12.2013 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Yavatmal, under Section 45...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to PSS Guidelines Exemption as Market Committees Assert Entitlement to Fees under Section 31 of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court examined the validity of clause B(ii) which required State exemption from all duties on PSS operations.

The writ petition was filed by the Maharashtra State Market Committee Co-operative Federation Ltd., representing over 290 Agricultural Produce Market ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show-Cause Notice Against Chairman in APMC Removal Case — Notice Issued by In-charge Officer Without Authority Under Section 45 of Maharashtra APMC Act

The petitioner, Sopanrao Onkarrao Sathe, Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Malkapur, challenged a show-cause notice dated 2.6.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Market Committee's Petition Challenging Quashing of Market Fee Demand on Processed Chicken. Processing of Chicken Does Not Constitute 'Sale' of Agricultural Produce Under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Panvel, and its Chairman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...