Search Results for "Judicial officers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Judicial officers"

4178 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4178 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Judicial Service Seniority Dispute. Court upheld original judgment finding no error apparent on record, determining that promotions in 2010 and direct recruitments in 2013 were separate selection processes not requiring cyclic order implementation under Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules.

30 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court was hearing Review Petitions filed by judicial officers challenging a previous judgment regarding seniority determinations in the Ra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Judicial Officers Challenging High Court Order Quashing Gradation List Based on Roster Points. Seniority for Promotion of Munsiffs Must Be Based on Merit, Not Reservation Roster, as Per Bimlesh Tanwar.

27 Jun 2022

The case involves a dispute over the fixation of seniority of Munsiffs (Batch of 2003) for promotion to the post of Sub-Judge in the State of Jammu & ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Judicial Officers in Abetment of Suicide Case. No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide Found.

5 Aug 2016

The case involves five judicial officers of the Maharashtra State judiciary, including the Principal District Judge of Yavatmal, who filed an applicat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officers Denied Promotion Despite Qualifying Suitability Test — Notional Promotion Granted from Date of Junior Officers' Appointment. The Court held that for the 65% promotional quota under the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Services (Recruitment, Appointment and Condition of Service) Rule, 2001, once a candidate qualifies the suitability test, promotion cannot be denied solely on the basis of a comparative merit list.

15 Jan 2025

The present appeal arose from a judgment dated 29.06.2022 of the High Court of Jharkhand, which dismissed a writ petition filed by the appellants, thr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Between Direct Recruits and Promotees in District Judge Cadre; Examines Application of 40-Point Roster System under Maharashtra Judicial Services (Seniority) Rules 2007. The vexed issue of seniority between direct recruits and promotees once again engages the Court; the Writ Petition challenges the Final Approved Seniority List dated 11-09-2015.

25 Oct 2018

Background: The case pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 filed by fourteen judicial officers holding various posts in the subordinate judici...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Allowances for Judicial Officers as Recommended by Second National Judicial Pay Commission. The Court rejected objections based on financial burden and equivalence with other government officers, holding that providing service conditions is a mandatory state duty essential for judicial functions and rule of law.

4 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, addressed objections from the Union Government and State Gove...

High Court

The High Court of Karnataka Division Bench heard writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge in a service matter involving judicial officers. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging the order dated 27-09-2013 in WP Nos. 41684-691/2012.

3 Apr 2014

These writ appeals, filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, arise from a common order dated 27-09-2013 passed by a learned Single...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Seniority Criteria in Higher Judicial Services to Constitution Bench in All India Judges Association Case. Amicus Curiae's Application Seeks to Address Disparity in Career Progression Between Direct Recruits and Promotees, Leading to Reference for Long-Lasting Solution.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court considered an interlocutory application filed by the amicus curiae in the ongoing All India Judges Association writ petition, highli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Second National Judicial Pay Commission Recommendations for District Judiciary — Upholds Uniform Pay, Pension, and Service Conditions as Essential for Judicial Independence. The Court held that financial security and economic independence of judicial officers are part of the basic structure of the Constitution, and directed uniform pay revision with a multiplier of 2.81 and pension at 50% of last drawn pay.

19 May 2023

The Supreme Court, in a writ petition filed by the All India Judges Association, addressed the implementation of the Second National Judicial Pay Comm...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)