Search Results for "Interested Person"

4249 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4249 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Examines Challenge to Assistant Charity Commissioner's Rejection of Section 41-A Application in Trust Management Dispute. Petition Seeks Restraint on Rival Faction's Administration of Grant-in-Aid School Pending Decision of Change Reports.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a writ petition challenging the order of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Buldhana, dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Developer Not a 'Person Interested' Under Section 3(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as Its Interest Arose After Acquisition Through Agreement with Acquiring Authority.

The dispute arose from land acquisition by the Burdwan Development Authority (BDA) for a satellite township in Burdwan, West Bengal, under the Land Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Adjacent Landowner in RERA Case — Locus Standi of Non-Allottee Denied. Project Completed Prior to RERA Act Not Required to Be Registered Under Section 3 of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The appellant, Dr. Yogesh Keshav Bele, owned land adjacent to a project called 'Blue Heaven' developed by Respondent No. 3. He was not an allottee in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal, Holds Managing Agents' Group Controlling Over 75% Voting Power Excludes Company from 'Public Interest' Under Section 23A. Partners of Managing Agency Forming a Controlling Group Cannot Be Counted as Public for Purposes of Exemption Under Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the applicability of Section 23A to a company where the Income-tax Officer sought ...