Search Results for "Indian Premier League"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Commission of Inquiry Report Against Media Company for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Report prepared without affording opportunity of hearing and beyond scope of reference under Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952.

The petitioner, M/s. DNA Entertainment Networks Private Limited, a media company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging FEMA Show Cause Notices Against BCCI President. Section 42 of FEMA applies to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of a company, and the petitioner as President is covered.

The petitioner, Shashank Vyankatesh Manohar, was the President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from 2008 to 2011. During this peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...